Author Archives: thomas

New Puzzle

Untitled presentation
I have put a new puzzle up. Nothing too tough this time. A classic algebra puzzle, which I have found to be pretty good as a test of how well GCSE/A-level students understand some basic points of algebra, while illustrating some important problem solving skills.

#4: Hidden depths…
A classic algebra puzzle.
Published:
 02/06/2015
Difficulty: *
Maths knowledge required: GCSE algebra [i.e. 14-16 year olds]. Although KS3 would do…

Click HERE to access the puzzle.

The solution will go up in a day or two.

Fractal Follow-up

detail_alternative_colours

There have been a few nice follow-ups on my fractals based on iterating the factorial function:

Steve Kass also directed me to this page, in which academic multitasker in computer science, neuroscience, philosophy and future studies Anders Sandberg presents some lovely alternative Gamma function fractals (posted in February). Intriguingly, the author has also co-written an academic paper on the science of tie-knots (apparently inspired by a costume from The Matrix Reloaded), which identifies “266,682 distinct tie-knots that seem tie-able with a normal neck-tie”. Surely worth a read.

In other news, I recently passed my PhD viva, which is probably for the best. Among other things, this means that my putative article on “How to fail your PhD” will have to be put on ice indefinitely.

Diabolical Digits

The other day, I did a mini-investigation into an interesting maths tweet from Cliff Pickover. Here’s another:

 

This fact is beautiful, but is it surprising?

Click here to find out.

 

Political Pi

The seat totals of the four largest political parties at the general election (excluding Northern Ireland and the speaker), 330, 232, 56, 8, appear in sequence, starting from the eighty-eight million, five hundred and eight thousand, three hundred and seventy-ninth digit of π, counting after the decimal point.

To think that the election result was staring us in the face all the time. If only we had known where to look, we could have saved ourselves all that bother with the polls

(Actually, √2 is even more helpful, giving us the DUP seat total as well. 330, 232, 56, 8, 8 appear in sequence, starting from the one billion, forty million, one hundred and thirty-two thousand, five hundred and seventy-third digit of √2, counting after the decimal point.)

Search for other numbers hidden in mathematical constants here.

Where it went wrong for the “Anti-Tory Majority”

Slide1

Just before the UK general election last week, using the probabilities of victory for each party in each seat calculated by electionforecast.co.uk, I posted a set of PDFs for keeping track of the separate battles that would define the contest. The focus was on whether the various left-leaning parties (Labour, SNP, Plaid Cymru, Green, SDLP, plus a couple of independents) across the UK could build a so-called “Anti-Tory Majority”, gaining the 323 seats necessary* to vote down a Conservative Queen’s Speech and thus prevent David Cameron from continuing as Prime Minister, in a widely predicted hung parliament scenario.

Using the probabilities from Election Forecast, I identified the 131 most likely seats that the left-bloc could win in Great Britain (actually 132, since the 131st and 132nd seats on the list were judged to be equally likely wins), which, when added to 188 “safe” Labour seats in England and 4 likely seats for allies in Northern Ireland, would add up to the magic 323. The 131 target seats were highlighted on the PDFs (see below).

Things looked fairly good for the “Anti-Tory Alliance”, since they were favoured by Election Forecast in 137 of the seats that I listed, six more than they needed. However, on election night, the Conservatives far outperformed expectations, winning 331 seats: a parliamentary majority without needing the support of any other parties.

Where did things go wrong for them?

Continue reading

Election Night Battleground Info-Sheets

Planning to avidly follow the election results this evening? No? Oh…

Here is a seat-by-seat set of fact sheets for following each subcontest of the election, with 2010 results, predicted probabilities of victory for each party (taken from electionforecast.co.uk, updated after their final forecast) and any prominent candidates that I could think of. Continue reading